Lexington Books (2018)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
Baldwin and McNabb explore how non-Christian religious traditions can utilize Plantinga’s epistemology. This book pays particular attention to the question, if there are believers from differing religious traditions that can rightfully utilize his epistemology, does this somehow prevent a Plantingian’s creedal-specific belief from being warranted?
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2019 |
| Buy this book | $77.77 used (26% off) $84.82 new (19% off) Amazon page |
| ISBN(s) | 1498552935 9781498552936 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 69,959
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The evolutionary argument against naturalism: a Wittgensteinian response.Michael DeVito & Tyler McNabb - forthcoming - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion:1-8.
Islamic Beliefs and Epistemic Defeaters: a Response to Baldwin and McNabb.Nader A. Alsamaani - 2022 - Sophia 61 (2):445-456.
Similar books and articles
Closing Pandora's Box: A Defence of Alvin Plantinga's Epistemology of Religious Belief.Tyler Dalton McNabb - unknown
The Self-Contradiction in Plantinga's Religious Epistemology and Exclusivism.Wei-chi Zhou - 2007 - Modern Philosophy 3:99-111.
Warranted Religion: Answering Objections to Alvin Plantinga's Epistemology – CORRIGENDUM.Tyler Dalton Mcnabb - 2015 - Religious Studies 51 (4):496-496.
Epistemology of religious belief as an essential part of philosophy of religion.Kirill Karpov - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 53 (3):8-18.
Reformed Epistemology and the Pandora’s Box Objection: The Vaiśeṣika and Mormon Traditions.Tyler Dalton McNabb & Erik D. Baldwin - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (2):451-465.
What Is Distinctive About the Epistemology of Religious Belief?William P. Alston - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:91-102.
Religious Diversity and Disagreement.Matthew A. Benton - 2019 - In Miranda Fricker, Peter Graham, David Henderson & Nikolaj Pedersen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 185-195.
First Person and Third Person Reasons and Religious Epistemology.Linda Zagzebski - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (2):285 - 304.
Reformed Epistemology and the Problem of Religious Diversity.Ramona Hosu - 2013 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 12 (34):266-274.
50 Years of Gettier: A New Direction in Religious Epistemology?Ian Michael Church - 2015 - Journal of Analytic Theology 3:147-171.
Religious Tolerance as the Basic Component of Inter-Religious Dialogue.Marina V. Vorobjova - 2004 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 3 (9):19-26.
Proper Function and the Conditions for Warrant: What Plantinga’s Notion of Warrant Shows About Different Kinds of Knowledge.Mark J. Boone - 2012 - Philosophia Christi 14 (2):373-386.
Critical Study of James K. Beilby, Epistemology as Theology: An Evaluation of Alvin Plantinga’s Religious Epistemology. [REVIEW]Tyler Wunder - 2007 - Philo 10 (2):168-186.
Religious Epistemological Disjunctivism.Kegan Shaw - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (3):261-279.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-08-13
Total views
1 ( #1,544,468 of 2,504,809 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,529 of 2,504,809 )
2018-08-13
Total views
1 ( #1,544,468 of 2,504,809 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,529 of 2,504,809 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
