NanoEthics 4 (2):129-132 (2010)

Van den Belt recently examined the notion that synthetic biology and the creation of ‘artificial’ organisms are examples of scientists ‘playing God’. Here I respond to some of the issues he raises, including some of his comments on my previous discussions of the value of the term ‘life’ as a scientific concept
Keywords Synthetic biology  Theology  Philosophy  Natural law
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11569-010-0091-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,192
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics.Mark Murphy - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
128 ( #91,272 of 2,507,320 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,393 of 2,507,320 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes