Is meaning cognized?

Mind and Language 38 (5):1276-1295 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I defend an account of linguistic comprehension on which meaning is not cognized, or on which we do not tacitly know our language's semantics. On this view, sentence comprehension is explained instead by our capacity to translate sentences into the language of thought. I explain how this view can explain our capacity to correctly interpret novel utterances, and then I defend it against several standing objections.

Similar books and articles

Individuals are abstractions.James R. Hurford - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):620-621.
Meaning.David Edward Cooper - 2003 - Carleton University Press.
Theory of meaning.Adrienne Lehrer - 1970 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall. Edited by Keith Lehrer.
Meaning.David E. Cooper - 2003 - Routledge.
Meaning In Speech and In Thought.Stephen Schiffer - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (250):141-159.
The Many Faces of Psychoontology.Konrad Werner - 2013 - Axiomathes 23 (3):525-542.
Linguistic meaning.Keith Allan - 1986 - New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
The Use of Expressions vs. Their Meaning. Problems and Dilemmas.Jerzy Pelc - 2007 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 26:219-246.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-25

Downloads
218 (#89,123)

6 months
101 (#38,938)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Balcarras
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

What Is It To Have A Language?David Balcarras - 2023 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 104 (4):837-866.
Functionalism and tacit knowledge of grammar.David Balcarras - 2023 - Philosophical Perspectives 37 (1):18-48.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Rules and representations.Noam Chomsky (ed.) - 1980 - New York: Columbia University Press.
The Modularity of Mind.Robert Cummins & Jerry Fodor - 1983 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):101.
Rules and representations.Noam Chomsky - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):1-15.
The Language of Thought.J. A. Fodor - 1978 - Critica 10 (28):140-143.

View all 70 references / Add more references