The fog of debate

Social Philosophy and Policy 38 (2):91-110 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The fog of war—poor intelligence about the enemy—can frustrate even a well-prepared military force. Something similar can happen in intellectual debate. What I call the *fog of debate* is a useful metaphor for grappling with failures and dysfunctions of argumentative persuasion that stem from poor information about our opponents. It is distressingly easy to make mistakes about our opponents’ thinking, as well as to fail to comprehend their understanding of and reactions to our arguments. After describing the fog of debate and outlining its sources in cognition and communication, I consider a few policies we might adopt upon learning we are in this fog.

Similar books and articles

What ignorance could not be.Ekaterina Kubyshkina & Mattia Petrolo - 2020 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 24 (2).
Tragic Flaws.Nathan Ballantyne - 2022 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 8 (1):20-40.
Scientific ignorance.Manuela Fernández Pinto - 2019 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 34 (2):195-211.
Why Suspend Judging?Jane Friedman - 2017 - Noûs 51 (2):302-326.
Irreconcilable Differences.Erin Taylor - 2013 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):181-192.
Hanlon’s Razor.Nathan Ballantyne & Peter H. Ditto - 2021 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 45:309-331.


Added to PP

679 (#25,736)

6 months
197 (#14,761)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Ballantyne
Arizona State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What do philosophers believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.
Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles.C. Thi Nguyen - 2020 - Episteme 17 (2):141-161.
Principia Ethica.George Edward Moore - 1903 - International Journal of Ethics 14 (3):377-382.
On Evidence in Philosophy.William G. Lycan - 2019 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2006 - Philosophy Compass.

View all 15 references / Add more references