Unmatched chains and the representation of plural pronouns

Natural Language Semantics 1 (1):33-73 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Plural pronouns create the possibility of overlapping reference, which does not not fit naturally into the classical GB theory of anaphora, where each NP has a single integer as its referential index. Thus, one must either complicate the indexing system used in syntax or complicate the semantic interpretation of indices. This paper argues for the former approach based on the properties of a particular comitative-like construction found in Mohawk and certain other languages. This construction is analyzed as a type of Left Dislocation where the dislocated NP forms a syntactic chain with a pronoun that it overlaps in reference with. Several unusual characteristics of such chains can be accounted for if plural pronouns have sets of integers as their indices—characteristics involving bound anaphora, ellipsis interpretation, and connectivity effects. Certain implications for the theory of chains are also discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
27 (#576,320)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On the semantics of locatives.Marcus Kracht - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (2):157-232.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Barriers.Noam Chomsky - 1986 - MIT Press.
Reciprocity and Plurality.I. Heim, H. Lasnik & R. May - 1991 - Linguistic Inquiry 22 (1):63--101.
On the absence of certain quantifiers in Mohawk.Mark C. Baker - 1995 - In Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 21--58.

View all 7 references / Add more references