Normalizing Foucault? A Rhizomatic Approach to Plateaus in Anglophone Educational Research

Foucault Studies 4:78-119 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper offers a rhizomatic reading of Foucault scholarship in anglophone educational research. It delineates unique parameters of an educational field, the conditions of receptivity for Foucault's work, and identifies three temporary plateau-formations that have erupted in educational research. Indebted to (non-formulaic) principles of connectivity and heterogeneity, multiplicity, and asignifying ruptures the analysis brings to notice the recombinatorial attributes of the discipline of education through attention to what is encamped and what seeps in debates over his work

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.22439/fs.v0i4.895

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A Review of “Why Foucault? New Directions in Educational Research”. [REVIEW]Kevin D. Vinson & Melissa B. Wilson - 2008 - Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc 44 (1):83-90.
Foucault, educational research and the issue of autonomy.Mark Olssen - 2005 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 37 (3):365–387.
plausibilities: A rhizo‐textual analysis of policy texts and teachers’ work.Eileen Honan - 2004 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 36 (3):267–281.
2 Foucault and educational research.James D. Marshall - 1990 - In Stephen J. Ball (ed.), Foucault and Education: Disciplines and Knowledge. Routledge. pp. 1--11.
Why Foucault? New directions in educational research – Edited by Peters, M. A. & Besley, A. C. [REVIEW] Namrata - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (3):313-314.
Putting Foucault to work in educational research.Dan W. Butin - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 40 (3):371–380.
The Product of Text and 'Other' Statements: Discourse analysis and the critical use of Foucault.Linda J. Graham - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (6):663-674.
The Learning Society and Governmentality: An introduction.Maarten Simons & Jan Masschelein - 2006 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (4):417-430.
Foucault, power, and education.Stephen J. Ball - 2013 - New York: Routledge.
The Reproduction of Philosophical Bodies in Education with Language.David Robert Cole - 2010 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (8):816-829.
Michael A. Peters and Tina (A.C.) Besley (eds.) , Why Foucault? New Directions in Educational Research (New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2007), ISBN: 978-0820478906. [REVIEW]Samuel Rocha - 2009 - Foucault Studies 7:144-147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
90 (#186,074)

6 months
4 (#800,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

A Review of “Why Foucault? New Directions in Educational Research”. [REVIEW]Kevin D. Vinson & Melissa B. Wilson - 2008 - Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc 44 (1):83-90.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references