Must science validate all knowledge?

In Anthony J. Sanford (ed.), The Nature and Limits of Human Understanding: The 2001 Gifford Lectures at the University of Glasgow (Gifford Lectures, University of Glasgow 2001). T & T Clark (London) (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scientific knowledge: a sociological analysis.Barry Barnes - 1996 - London: Athlone. Edited by David Bloor & John Henry.
Knowledge: critical concepts.Nico Stehr & Reiner Grundmann (eds.) - 2005 - New York: Routledge.
Health science, natural science, and clinical knowledge.R. John Bench - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (2):147-164.
Saving eliminativism.Rod Bertolet - 1994 - Philosophical Psychology 7 (1):87-100.
Policing knowledge: Disembodied policy for embodied knowledge.Joseph Rouse - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 34 (3-4):353 – 364.
On the twofold nature of artefacts.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (1):132-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lynne Rudder Baker
PhD: Vanderbilt University; Last affiliation: University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references