Logic and singular propositions

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):155 – 169 (1953)

Abstract

The author contends that the analogies between "the logical roles of singular and universal statements" are important but do not "justify the conclusion that singular statements are reducible to propositions" of the forms a, E, I, And o. (staff)

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#222,204)

6 months
1 (#386,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Philosophical Analysis: A Collection of Essays.Max Black (ed.) - 1950 - Ithaca, NY, USA: Freeport, N.Y., Books for Libraries Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Metalogic of Quantum Logic.Peter Mittelstaedt - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:249 - 256.
Singular Propositions and Singular Thoughts.Arthur Sullivan - 1998 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39 (1):114-127.
Singular Propositions and the A Priori.Kai-yee Wong - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:107-116.
Singular Thoughts and Singular Propositions.Joshua Armstrong & Jason Stanley - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):205 - 222.
Singular Propositions and Modal Logic.Christopher Menzel - 1993 - Philosophical Topics 21 (2):113-148.
Attitudes Without Propositions.Mark Balaguer - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (4):805-26.