Are the laws of nature deductively closed?

In H. Sankey (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature. Kluwer Academic Press. pp. 91--109 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Laws in nature.Stephen Mumford - 2004 - New York: Routledge.
Ceteris paribus laws: Classification and deconstruction. [REVIEW]Gerhard Schurz - 2002 - Erkenntnis 57 (3):351Ð372.
Models: The blueprints for laws.Nancy Cartwright - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):303.
A theorem concerning syntactical treatments of nonidealized belief.Charles B. Cross - 2001 - Synthese 129 (3):335 - 341.
Laws and Lawmakers Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature.Marc Lange - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Argument from Laws of Nature Reassessed.Richard Swinburne - 2004 - In M. Ruse & W. Dembski (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to Dna. Cambridge University Press.
Some Laws of Nature are Metaphysically Contingent.John T. Roberts - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):445-457.
Laws of nature.Norman Swartz - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Popper on Laws and Counterfactuals.Danilo Šuster - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):109-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-08-21

Downloads
83 (#198,631)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Baker
Swarthmore College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references