Consenting Under Coercion: The Partial Validity Account

Philosophical Quarterly 74 (3):709-731 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How is the validity of our consent, and others’ moral permission to act on our consent affected by coercion? Everyone agrees that in cases of two-party coercion—when X coerces Y to do something with or for X—the consent of the coerced is invalid, and the coercer is not permitted to act upon the consent they receive. But coercers and the recipients of consent are not always identical. Sometimes a victim, Y, agrees to do something to, with, or for Z because they are being coerced by X. Recently, several philosophers have argued that consent under third-party coercion can be fully valid. We argue that this view has troubling implications. We develop a novel view of consent in third-party coercion cases, which we call the partial validity account. The core idea is that, under severe coercion, Y’s consent is at most partially valid—it reduces the strength of, but does not completely dissolve, Z’s consent-sensitive duties. We argue that the partial validity account gets the right results in important cases and explains the moral factors at play better than alternative accounts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Consenting Under Third-Party Coercion.Maximilian Kiener - 2021 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 19 (4):361-389.
Validity, Legal.John O. Tyler Jr - 2014 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Validity in Simple Partial Logic.Daisuke Kachi - 2002 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 10 (4):139-153.
Coercive Interference and Moral Judgment.Jan-Willem van der Rijt - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):549 - 567.
Partial Logic as a Logic of Extensional Alethic Modality.Daisuke Kachi - 2007 - Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 34 (2):61-70.
Moral Coercion.Saba Bazargan - 2014 - Philosophers' Imprint 14.
Coercion, Threats, and the Puzzle of Blackmail.Grant Lamond - 1996 - In A. P. Simester & A. T. H. Smith (eds.), Harm and Culpability. Oxford University Press. pp. 215-38.
External Validity: Is There Still a Problem?Alexandre Marcellesi - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):1308-1317.
Knowledge of Validity.Sinan Dogramaci - 2010 - Noûs 44 (3):403-432.
Equality and the Significance of Coercion.Gabriel Wollner - 2011 - Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (4):363-381.
Kierkegaard on the eternal validity of the self.Brian K. Powell - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 76 (4):305-314.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-01

Downloads
50 (#325,738)

6 months
17 (#161,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Patrick Tomlin
University of Warwick
Sameer Bajaj
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations