Res Philosophica 93 (1):205-218 (2016)

Authors
Andrew M. Bailey
Yale-NUS College
Abstract
According to the doctrine of animalism, we are animals in the primary and non-derivative sense. In this article, I introduce and defend a novel argument for the view.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  History of Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016
ISBN(s) 2168-9105
DOI 10.11612/resphil.2016.93.1.9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Oxford University Press.

View all 58 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Generic Animalism.Andrew M. Bailey & Peter van Elswyk - 2021 - Journal of Philosophy 118 (8):405-429.
Why Animalism Matters.Andrew M. Bailey, Allison Krile Thornton & Peter van Elswyk - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (9):2929-2942.
Material Through and Through.Andrew M. Bailey - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (8):2431-2450.
Animalism.Stephan Blatti - 2014 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Our Animal Interests.Andrew M. Bailey - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (9):2315-2328.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Animal Welfare.C. R. W. Spedding - 2000 - Earthscan Publications.
Popular Media and Animals.Claire Molloy - 2011 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Animal Rights.Shasta Gaughen (ed.) - 2005 - Greenhaven Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-10-03

Total views
4,424 ( #667 of 2,507,019 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
681 ( #495 of 2,507,019 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes