Ultimate and proximate influences on human sex differences

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (3-4):266-267 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We agree with Archer that human sex differences in aggression are well explained by sexual selection, but note that explanations of human behaviors are not logically mutually exclusive from explanations and therefore should not be framed as such. We discuss why this type of framing hinders the development of both social learning and evolutionary theories of human behavior

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Causes, proximate and ultimate.Richard C. Francis - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (4):401-415.
Proximate and ultimate causations.Ernst Mayr - 1993 - Biology and Philosophy 8 (1):93-94.
The proximate mechanisms and ultimate functions of smiles.Marc Mehu & Karim N'Diaye - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6):454-455.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
18 (#785,610)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex.Charles Darwin - 1898 - New York: Plume. Edited by Carl Zimmer.
The Gender Similarities Hypothesis.Janet Shibley Hyde - 2005 - American Psychologist 60 (6):581-592.

Add more references