The Socratic "Theages": Essays and Commentary

Dissertation, Cornell University (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The first half of this dissertation consists of three essays about the Theages' dramatic structure, Socrates' divine sign, and authorship. The second half is a commentary and appendices supporting the first half and treating stylistic, grammatical, and textual questions. ;The dialogue's dramatic structure is as follows. Demodocus and Theages approach Socrates ostensibly for advice. They really want Socratic tutelage for Theages. Socrates takes them at their word and begins the process of advising by questioning Theages about the wisdom he wants to acquire. At 227a8f., however, Theages pleads that Socrates tutor him, and Demodocus passionately seconds that request. From that point until the dialogue's end, Socrates is on the defensive. He does not refuse Theages, but he ensures that both Theages and Demodocus have considered alternatives and know what Socrates is like. ;The Theages has been handed down to us as Platonic. No one in antiquity doubted that it was Platonic as far as we know, but nonetheless it has frequently been athetized by modern scholars. The style does not depart from the style of the early Platonic-Socratic dialogues. I doubt that the dialogue was written by Plato, but my doubts fall short of proof. The content, however, departs in several ways from the early Platonic-Socratic dialogues. Firstly, Socrates appears to present himself as a teacher of conversational skill rather than a seeker after virtue. That is counter to the norm in Plato. Next, Socrates' divine sign is emphasized, boasted over, and explained in detail more than anywhere else in the Platonic corpus. That is counter to the spirit of the other dialogues. Furthermore, the sign appears to be not simply apotreptic in the Theages, but also protreptic, a trait shared with the Alcibiades I and likely the Theaetetus as well. Examination reveals, however, that the sign is not protreptic in the Theages. The Theages' account of the sign differs from other accounts of it by adding information rather than by being incompatible with the other accounts. The most important addition is other-orientedness: it warns Socrates about his friends' actions. It does not do that in the acceptedly Platonic dialogues

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Socratic.Harold Tarrant - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (2):131-155.
The Touch of Socrates.Dorothy Tarrant - 1958 - Classical Quarterly 8 (1-2):95-.
The socratic paradox and its enemies (review). [REVIEW]Maureen Eckert - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 476-477.
Socratic Courage in Plato's Socratic Dialogues.Shigeru Yonezawa - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4):645-665.
Socratic Midwifery.Julius Tomin - 1987 - Classical Quarterly 37 (01):97-.
Socrates and Plato.Patrick Duncan - 1940 - Philosophy 15 (60):339 - 362.
Socrates in the platonic dialogues.Catherine Osborne - 2005 - Philosophical Investigations 29 (1):1–21.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
1 (#1,769,934)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references