Activity in Marx's Philosophy [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 22 (4):756-756 (1969)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This fifty-page essay treats Marx's concept of action as the principle underlying his whole system. Activity for Marx is described as both a philosophical concept and an element of human experience demanded by his system. The principle of activity is present as early as in Marx's doctoral dissertation and its influence is traced on his materialism, epistemology, and conception of philosophy. In the process, some strong similarities are shown with Dewey's concept of action, despite the difference in goals of the two philosophers. The concept of action was not original with Marx as the author demonstrates in his discussion of Kant's epistemology and Hegel's dialectics. What distinguishes Marx's concept of action is the unification of theory and practice, and the interrelationship of the two on a materialist foundation. To Marx, there was no meaningful theory without practice and no effective action without theory. Furthermore, the oft-quoted statement by Marx that philosophers have only interpreted the world whereas the point is to change it asserts only half of the case. Marx is not advocating change for the sake of change or change in accordance with any interpretation of the world. He is proposing change of a very specific kind and his concept of action cannot be separated from its content. This point does not emerge as clearly as it should in the essay under consideration because the author tends to treat the concept of activity in isolation and as an uninfluenced influence on the rest of Marx's thought. The author welcomes Marx's emphasis on practice as a much-needed antidote to the trend that makes philosophy a world apart. He also approves Marx's active personal role in society and his unhesitating entry into debate with the finest minds of his time. Of great value to those interested in the young Marx is the author's translation of Marx's doctoral dissertation on The Difference Between the Democritean and Epicurean Philosophy of Nature. This is the first complete translation to appear in English. It occupies half the space of the present volume.--H. B.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Creative Activity and Alienation in Hegel and Marx.Sean Sayers - 2003 - Historical Materialism 11 (1):107-128.
Marx's discourse with Hegel.Norman Levine - 2012 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Marx and alienation: essays on Hegelian themes.Sean Sayers - 2011 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Why Work? Marx and Human Nature.Sean Sayers - 2005 - Science and Society 69 (4):606 - 616.
Marx's embryology of society.Arno Wouters - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (2):149-179.
The Concept of Labor: Marx and His Critics.Sean Sayers - 2007 - Science and Society 71 (4):431 - 454.
Marx’s ontology of the praxis-relations of social production.Wujin Yu - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):400-416.
Rereading Marx: A Critique of Recent Criticisms.Randy Martin - 1998 - Science and Society 62 (4):513 - 536.
Activity in Marx's philosophy.Norman D. Livergood - 1968 - The Hague,: Martinus Nijhoff. Edited by Karl Marx.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
27 (#557,528)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references