Incompactness of the A1 Fragment of Basic Second Order Propositional Relevant Logic

Australasian Journal of Logic 16 (1):1-8 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this note we provide a simple proof of the incompactness over Routley-Meyer B-frames of the A1 fragment of the second order propositional relevant language.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The relevant fragment of first order logic.Guillermo Badia - 2016 - Review of Symbolic Logic 9 (1):143-166.
Expressivity of second order propositional modal logic.Balder ten Cate - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (2):209-223.
On Sahlqvist Formulas in Relevant Logic.Guillermo Badia - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (4):673-691.
Model definability in relevant logic.Guillermo Badia - 2017 - IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 3 (4):623-646.
Combinator logics.Lou Goble - 2004 - Studia Logica 76 (1):17 - 66.
The One-Variable Fragment of T→.John Slaney & Edward Walker - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (5):867-878.
Andersonian Deontic Logic, Propositional Quantification, and Mally.Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (3):385-395.
An Event-Based Fragment of First-Order Logic over Intervals.Savas Konur - 2011 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (1):49-68.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-22

Downloads
21 (#715,461)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Guillermo Badia
University of Queensland

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations