Continuous Deep Sedation and Euthanasia in Pediatrics: Does One Really Exclude the Other for Terminally Ill Patients?

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44 (1):50-70 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Debates on morally acceptable and lawful end-of-life practices in pediatrics were reignited by the recent amendment in Belgian law to allow euthanasia for minors of any age who meet the criteria for capacity. Euthanasia and its legalization in pediatrics are often opposed based on the availability of aggressive palliative sedation. For terminally ill patients, this type of sedation is often identified as continuous and deep sedation until death. We demonstrate that this reasoning is based on flawed assumptions: CDS is a morally preferable alternative to euthanasia; CDS can meet the same patient needs as euthanasia; children lack the capacity and experience to make EOL decisions; unlike euthanasia, CDS does not raise capacity issues. Our aim is not to reject CDS as a valid option at the EOL, nor to offer a clear-cut defense of euthanasia for minors, but to emphasize the ethical issues with both practices.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The 'French exception: the right to continuous deep sedation at the end of life.Ruth Horn - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics Recent Issues 44 (3):204-205.
Palliative Care and Euthanasia.Bert Broeckaert & Rien Janssens - 2002 - Ethical Perspectives 9 (2):156-175.
Distinguishing Terminal Sedationfrom Euthanasia.Patrick T. Smith - 2015 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (2):287-301.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-15

Downloads
20 (#656,480)

6 months
3 (#447,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?