Why speaker intentions aren't part of context

Kent Bach
San Francisco State University
It is widely though not universally accepted what speakers refer to in using demonstratives or “discretionary” (as opposed to “automatic”) indexicals depends on their intentions. Even so, people tend not to appreciate the consequences of this claim for the view that demonstratives and most indexicals refer as a function of context: these expressions suffer from a “character deficiency.” No wonder I am asked from time to time why I resist the temptation to include speaker intentions as a parameter of context. So I thought it would be a good idea to compile some of the scattered statements of my main reasons for this evidently radical view.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,091
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Out of Context.Jerry Fodor & Ernie Lepore - 2004 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 78 (2):77-94.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
170 ( #68,956 of 2,506,115 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,984 of 2,506,115 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes