Authors
Bach Ho
California State University, Fullerton
Abstract
This paper defends the view that intrinsic benefit to a human being consists exclusively in survival. It takes as its point of departure the neo-Aristotelian view that inquiry into intrinsic benefit to a human being should take place within a wider theory of intrinsic benefit to living things, generally. The paper first argues that the neo-Aristotelian view that intrinsic benefit to a living thing consists in flourishing as a member of its species, is mistaken. Rather, intrinsic benefit to a living thing consists in survival, and not survival as a member of its species, but survival simpliciter. A refined understanding of survival is developed in the paper. The paper then applies this Survivalist account of intrinsic benefit to human beings: The things we take to be good for human beings—e.g., pleasure, desire-fulfillment, etc.—are good to the extent and because they promote the one intrinsic benefit of survival.
Keywords well-being  neo-Aristotelian naturalism  flourishing  virtue ethics  nature of life
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Virtue Ethics.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Natural Goodness.Philippa Foot - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
Perfectionism.Thomas Hurka - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
Well-Being.Roger Crisp - 2017 - In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Natural Goodness.Philippa Foot - 2001 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 64 (3):604-606.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Part‐Intrinsicality.J. Robert G. Williams - 2013 - Noûs 47 (3):431-452.
To What Extent Must We Go Beyond Neo-Aristotelian Ethical Naturalism?David Mcpherson - 2012 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):627-654.
Flourishing Ethics.Terrell Ward Bynum - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):157-173.
All About Eve:A Report on Environmental Virtue Ethics Today.Robert Hull - 2005 - Ethics and the Environment 10 (1):89-110.
The Survival of Sentient Beings.John Malyon Inglis - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)
Anthropocentric Biocentrism in a Hybrid. Coren - 2015 - Ethics and the Environment 20 (2):48-60.
Nature as a Moral Resource.Ernest Partridge - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (2):101-130.
Modern Moral Philosophy Again: Isolating the Promulgation Problem.Candace Vogler - 2006 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (3):345–362.
Virtue as Loving the Good.Thomas Hurka - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):149.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-25

Total views
128 ( #90,194 of 2,499,697 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #50,813 of 2,499,697 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes