The myth of conventional implicature

Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (4):327-366 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Grice’s distinction between what is said and what is implicated has greatly clarified our understanding of the boundary between semantics and pragmatics. Although border disputes still arise and there are certain difficulties with the distinction itself (see the end of §1), it is generally understood that what is said falls on the semantic side and what is implicated on the pragmatic side. But this applies only to what is..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
656 (#24,311)

6 months
22 (#112,190)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kent Bach
San Francisco State University

Citations of this work

Assertion, knowledge, and context.Keith DeRose - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (2):167-203.
Slurring Perspectives.Elisabeth Camp - 2013 - Analytic Philosophy 54 (3):330-349.
Slurring Words.Luvell Anderson & Ernie Lepore - 2011 - Noûs 47 (1):25-48.

View all 166 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Thought and reference.Kent Bach - 1987 - New York: Clarendon Press.
On sense and reference.Gottlob Frege - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 36--56.
Relevance.D. Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1986 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 2.
The Pragmatics of What is Said.François Recanati - 1989 - Mind and Language 4 (4):295-329.

View all 16 references / Add more references