Toleration vs. doctrinal evil in our time

The Journal of Ethics 8 (3):225-250 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our time is characterized by what seems like an unprecedented process of intense global homogenization. This reality provides the context for exploring the nature and value of toleration. Hence, this essay is meant primarily as a contribution to international ethics rather than political philosophy. It is argued that because of the non-eliminability of differences in the world we should not even hope that there can be only one global religion or ideology. Further exploration exposes conceptual affinity between the concepts of intolerance, ideology, and doctrinal evil. The last concept is developed in contrast to pure evil and average evil, and under the assumption of the metaphysical necessity of free will. Doctrinal evil is found to represent the main source of intolerance as a result of a mechanism that tends to confuse doctrinal evil (or the competing conceptions of the good) with pure evil. This connection between doctrinal evil and pure evil provides ideologies with their forcefulness. Tolerance cannot be properly understood in terms of a simple opposition to intolerance, however. Tolerance emerges as a sort of vigilance, conscientiousness, and non-negligence based not on a supposedly correct interpretation of the good, but rather on the acceptance of the fallibility of any such attempted definition. Conversely, the principal evil in doctrinal evil is found in arrogance that accompanies the intolerance-inducing irresponsible thoughtlessness. With this conceptual topology in mind the paper also addresses questions regarding religious tolerance, the ideology of human rights and democracy, the right to self-defense, ways to face evil, the dialectics of using old names for novel evils, and related issues

Similar books and articles

A philosophy of evil.Lars Fr H. Svendsen - 2010 - Champaign, IL: Dalkey Archive Press.
The nature of evil.Daryl Koehn - 2005 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Is All Evil Really Only Privation?John F. Crosby - 2001 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:197-209.
The concept of evil.Marcus G. Singer - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (2):185-214.
The myth of evil: demonizing the enemy.Phillip Cole - 2006 - Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
On Evils, Evil, Radical Evil and the Demonic.Agnes Heller - 2011 - Critical Horizons 12 (1):15-27.
This side of evil.Michael Gelven - 1998 - Milwaukee, Wis.: Marquette University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
812 (#16,942)

6 months
93 (#38,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jovan Babic
University of Belgrade

Citations of this work

Does hope morally vindicate faith?Anne Jeffrey - 2017 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 81 (1-2):193-211.
Orthodox Christianity and War.Jovan Babić - 2021 - Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 63 (11):39-57.
The Structure of Peace.Jovan Babić - 2013, Paperback - In Jovan Babić & Petar Bojanić (eds.), World Governance. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 202-216.
World Governance.Jovan Babić (ed.) - 2013, Paperback - Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Persuasive definitions.Charles Leslie Stevenson - 1938 - Mind 47 (187):331-350.

Add more references