Whose development? What hegemony? Tackling the structural dynamics of global social injustice

Ethics and Global Politics 12 (4):32-39 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I briefly review the main parameters of the conceptual framework David Ingram builds, and then proceed to test its heuristic power by examining its capacity to address three types of domination (relational, structural and systemic) typical of contemporary capitalism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A realist theory of hegemony.Jonathan Joseph - 2000 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30 (2):179–202.
Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model.Iris Marion Young - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):102-130.
Blameless Participation in Structural Injustice.David Atenasio - 2019 - Social Theory and Practice 45 (2):149-177.
Structural Injustice and Massively Shared Obligations.Anne Schwenkenbecher - 2021 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (1):1-16.
Two ways of realizing justice and democracy: linking Amartya Sen and Elinor Ostrom.James Tully - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2):220-232.
Responsabilidad Y justicia global: Un modelo de conexión social.Iris Marion Young - 2005 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 39:689-726.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-18

Downloads
16 (#880,136)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Albena Azmanova
University of Kent at Canterbury

References found in this work

The paradox of emancipation: Populism, democracy and the soul of the Left.Albena Azmanova - 2019 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 45 (9-10):1186-1207.

Add more references