Experience and the Space of Reasons

Sophia Perennis 17 (37):5-35 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Throughout their writings, John McDowell and Richard Rorty draw on Kant’s influential account of experience. For Rorty, Kant is the antagonist who succumbs to foundationalism or what Sellars calls the Myth of the Given and Wittgenstein is the hero who helps in overcoming the siren call of the Myth. McDowell, however, is ambivalent toward Kant. With Sellars, he applauds Kant as the hero who helped us vanquish the Myth of the Given. But he argues that Kant failed to recognize the full strength of his account of experience and capitulated to a subjective idealism. Wittgenstein, for McDowell, is the hero who helps us achieve an account of experience that gets to the things themselves. I adjudicate the philosophical and the exegetical tensions between Rorty and McDowell and support the latter’s approach to experience and to the reading of Kant and Wittgenstein.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Aesthetic Grounding for the Role of Concepts in Experience in Kant, Wittgenstein and Mcdowell.Tim Thornton - 2007 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 12 (2):227-245.
Crossing the line: Sellars on Kant on imagination.Luca Corti - 2012 - Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 41 (1-3):41-71.
Kant, McDowell and the Theory of Consciousness.Alan Thomas - 2002 - European Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):283-305.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-04

Downloads
441 (#40,111)

6 months
136 (#20,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Mohammad Azadpur
San Francisco State University
Mohammad Azadpur
San Francisco State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe.
Empiricism and the philosophy of mind.Wilfrid Sellars - 1956 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1:253-329.
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1998 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edited by J. M. D. Meiklejohn. Translated by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood.
Wittgenstein on rules and private language.Saul A. Kripke - 1982 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173 (4):496-499.
Critique of pure reason.Immanuel Kant - 1781/1998 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Blackwell. pp. 449-451.

View all 12 references / Add more references