Strong versus Weak Sustainability: Economics, Natural Sciences, and Consilience

Environmental Ethics 23 (2):155-168 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The meaning of sustainability is the subject of intense debate among environmental and resource economists. Perhaps no other issue separates more clearly the traditional economic view from the views of most natural scientists. The debate currently focuses on the substitutability between the economy and the environment or between “natural capital” and “manufactured capital”—a debate captured in terms of weak versus strong sustainability. In this article, we examine the various interpretations of these concepts. We conclude that natural science and economic perspectives on sustainability are inconsistent. The market-based Hartwick-Solow “weak sustainability” approach is far removed from both the ecosystem-based “Holling sustainability” and the “strong sustainability” approach of Daly and others. Each of these sustainability criteria implies a specific valuation approach, and thus an ethical position, to support monetary indicators of sustainability such as a green or sustainable Gross Domestic Product. The conflict between “weak sustainability” and “strong sustainability” is more evident in the context of centralized than decentralized decision making. In particular, firms selling “services” instead of material goods and regarding the latter as “capital” leads to decisions more or less consistent with either type of sustainability. Finally, we discuss the implications of global sustainability for such open systems as regions and countries. Open systems have not been dealt with systematically for any of the sustainability criteria.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A framework for sustainability.Joseph Tainter - 2003 - World Futures 59 (3 & 4):213 – 223.
Sustainability Perspectives.Lionel Boxer - 2007 - Philosophy of Management 6 (2):87-97.
Multiple levels of corporate sustainability.Marcel van Marrewijk & Marco Werre - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):107-119.
Risk Management as a Tool for Sustainability.Frank C. Krysiak - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (S3):483 - 492.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
148 (#127,351)

6 months
9 (#309,818)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Taboos in Corporate Social Responsibility Discourse.Tomi J. Kallio - 2007 - Journal of Business Ethics 74 (2):165-175.
Sustainable Engineering Science for Resolving Wicked Problems.Thomas Seager, Evan Selinger & Arnim Wiek - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (4):467-484.
Book review. [REVIEW]Sven Ove Hansson - 2006 - Erkenntnis 64 (3):419-422.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references