What Is Realism?

Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75:91-110 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A scholastic-Cartesian schema faithfully maps ordinary, effective ways of dealing with intentionality; yet its apparent incoherence provokes philosophers into opting for one of two stances, 'Cartesian' or 'direct realist', seemingly incompatible, yet each seem in accord with ordinary thought. A wide range of canonical and current theories, realist, idealist and hybrid, essentially involve one option or the other. We should instead consider why the language of intentionality, with its apparent anomalies, works so well. Released from the obligation to opt for one stance over the other, we can identify a robust realism different in kind from anything currently on offer.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 77,805

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Realism?Michael Ayers & Paul Snowdon - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (1):293-320.
What is realism?Paul Snowdon - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (2):201–228.
Van Fraassen’s Unappreciated Realism.Ernan McMullin - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):455-478.
Replacing recipe realism.Juha Saatsi - 2017 - Synthese 194 (9):3233-3244.
Semantic indeterminacy and the realist stance.Ron Wilburn - 1992 - Erkenntnis 37 (3):281 - 308.
Direct realism, intentionality, and the objective being of ideas.Paul Hoffman - 2002 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2):163-179.
A New Epistemic Argument for Idealism.Robert Smithson - 2018 - In Tyron Goldschmidt & Kenneth Pearce (eds.), Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 17-33.
Veridical Hallucination.Tzu-Ying Lu - 2002 - Philosophy and Culture 29 (11):1040-1050.
Michael Dummett.Bernhard Weiss - 2002 - Princeton University Press.
Michael Dummett.Bernhard Weiss - 2002 - Routledge.


Added to PP

15 (#707,185)

6 months
1 (#483,081)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

What the disjunctivist is right about.Alan Millar - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):176-199.
The formulation of disjunctivism: A response to fish.Paul F. Snowdon - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (1):129-141.
What is Realism?Michael Ayers & Paul Snowdon - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (1):293-320.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references