Are Frege cases exceptions to intentional generalizations?

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):1-22 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This piece criticizes Fodor's argument (in The Elm and the Expert, 1994) for the claim that Frege cases should be treated as exceptions to (broad) psychological generalizations rather than as counterexamples.

Similar books and articles

What Frege’s Theory of Identity is Not.Robert May - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):41-48.
On the testability of psychological generalizations (psychological testability).David K. Henderson - 1991 - Philosophy of Science (December) 586 (December):586-606.
Fodor on concepts and Frege puzzles.Murat Aydede - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (4):289-294.
Fodor's modal argument.Frederick Adams - 1993 - Philosophical Psychology 6 (1):41-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,039 (#12,224)

6 months
141 (#22,450)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip Robbins
University of Missouri, Columbia
Murat Aydede
University of British Columbia

Citations of this work

The language of thought hypothesis.Murat Aydede - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The edenic theory of reference.Elmar Unnsteinsson - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (3):276-308.
The Causal Inefficacy of Content.Gabriel M. A. Segal - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (1):80-102.
The computational theory of mind.Steven Horst - 2005 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations