The Thomistic Distinction between the Act of Understanding and the Formation of a Mental Word: Intelligere and Dicere in Aquinas
The Incarnate Word 9 (1):33-49 (2022)
AbstractWhat is the distinction between understanding and forming a concept? In my view, for Aquinas, intelligere (the act of understanding) and dicere (the forming of a verbum or mental word) are not two different acts, but simply two different aspects of the same act of understanding. In the following, I will explore more in depth what this distinction means for Aquinas. Firstly, I will give a mostly doctrinal or systematic overview of the issue and, secondly, I will support my claims with relevant textual evidence, taken exclusively from Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae. This study, as an appendix, is part of “The Influence of Kant in Transcendental Thomism: Rahner, Lonergan and Von Balthasar” (forthcoming). In my view, Lonergan’s way of distinguishing intelligere and dicere is different from St. Thomas’ way. In the body of my book, I focus on Lonergan’s reasons to distinguish these notions in his own particular way, whereas this study focuses on St. Thomas’ doctrine. It is my hope that the following lines will foster an understanding of St. Thomas’ epistemology and of its application to Trinitarian theology.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
“Utrum Idem Sint Dicere Et Intelligere Sive Videre in Mente”: Robert Kilwardby, Quaestiones in Librum Primum Sententiarum.Mary Sirridge - 2007 - Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):253-268.
Mental Language in Aquinas?Joshua P. Hochschild - 2015 - In Gyula Klima (ed.), Intentionality, Cognition, and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy. New York: Fordham University. pp. 29-45.
The Difference Between Aquinas and Kant in the Approach to Human Understanding.Andres Ayala - 2020 - The Incarnate Word 7 (1):151-167.
Recent Thomistic Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion.Paul Macdonald - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (3):517–533.
Wissen ohne Grenzen? Zur Offenheit und Weite des Eckhartschen Erkennens.Udo Kern - 2006 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 48 (2):109-130.
Ratio, Intelligere, and Cogitare in Anselm’s Ontological Argument.Catherine Nolan - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:199-208.
Uses of the Person-Nature Distinction in Thomas's Christology.Michael Gorman - 2000 - Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 67 (1):58-79.
On Value and Obligation in Practical Reason: Toward a Resolution of the Is–Ought Problem in the Thomistic Moral Tradition.William Matthew Diem - 2021 - Nova et Vetera 19 (2): 531-562.
''Idem Dicere in Corde, Et Cogitare''. Or: What We Still Can Learn From an Existential Anselm.B. Angelet - 1987 - Aquinas 30 (1):93-108.
1. Verbum: Definition and Understanding.Robert M. Doran Sj - 1997 - In Verbum: Word and Idea in Aquinas, Volume 2. University of Toronto Press. pp. 12-59.
Verbum: Word and Idea in Aquinas. [REVIEW]Garrett Barden - 1968 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 17:250-254.
Esse Et Intelligere En Tomás de Aquino Según El “Realismo Pensante” de Francisco Canals Vidal.Martín F. Echavarría - 2015 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 71 (2-3):545-566.