Protest Petitions

Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (2):205-212 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX


ABSTRACT This paper is concerned with the question of whether an individual has a moral obligation to sign a protest petition which has been initiated on moral grounds. It is argued that there is such an obligation when the petition represents a viewpoint with which one broadly agrees. This is a general dury which may lapse with changed circumstances or which may be redeemed by some alternative action. It is argued that the duty to initiate a protest petition is, on the other hand, supererogatory as far as an individual is concerned, but may be a duty for a community or group. Finally it is argued that protest petitions are essentially protests, not against evil deeds as such, but against evil deeds done in one's own name, and are therefore a vital aspect of democracy.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,420

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

‘Hate the sin but not the sinner’: forgiveness and condemnation.Kelly Hamilton - 2009 - South African Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):114-123.
Electronic petition as an effective tool for political participation of citizens.A. K. Konstantynivska - 2018 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 1 (1-2):89-95.
Multidimensionality category of political protest.T. Vorobyova - 2014 - Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social and Political Sciences 2 (24):213-220.


Added to PP

34 (#465,800)

6 months
7 (#617,448)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Avishai Margalit
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references