Formalizing forcing arguments in subsystems of second-order arithmetic

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 82 (2):165-191 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that certain model-theoretic forcing arguments involving subsystems of second-order arithmetic can be formalized in the base theory, thereby converting them to effective proof-theoretic arguments. We use this method to sharpen the conservation theorems of Harrington and Brown-Simpson, giving an effective proof that WKL+0 is conservative over RCA0 with no significant increase in the lengths of proofs

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
87 (#191,321)

6 months
24 (#113,849)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremy Avigad
Carnegie Mellon University

Citations of this work

Saturated models of universal theories.Jeremy Avigad - 2002 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 118 (3):219-234.
Number theory and elementary arithmetic.Jeremy Avigad - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (3):257-284.

View all 25 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

[Omnibus Review].Kenneth Kunen - 1969 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 34 (3):515-516.
Fragments of arithmetic.Wilfried Sieg - 1985 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 28 (1):33-71.
Herbrand analyses.Wilfried Sieg - 1991 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 30 (5-6):409-441.
Fragments of Arithmetic.Wilfried Sieg - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (4):1054-1055.

View all 7 references / Add more references