Zygon 56 (1):118-138 (2021)
Abstract |
During the last decades it has been common to assert—especially in the field of science and religion—that the aims characteristic of religious practice determine the norms we should employ when evaluating its normative status. However, until now, this issue has not been properly investigated by paying attention to contemporary metanormative research. In this article, I critically examine how different popular theories of normativity relate to the proposed normative significance of the aims characteristic of religious practice. I argue that whether or not, and in what way exactly, the aims characteristic of religious practice are normatively significant is highly dependent both on controversial issues concerning the nature of religion, and on a number of controversial metanormative issues.
|
Keywords | Mikael Stenmark Stephen Jay Gould epistemology metaethics normativity philosophy relativism science and religion |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/zygo.12667 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Persons, Character, and Morality.Bernard Williams - 1976 - In James Rachels (ed.), Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980. Cambridge University Press.
Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives.Philippa Foot - 1972 - Philosophical Review 81 (3):305-316.
View all 22 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
How Rational is Rational Theology? A Reply to Mikael Stenmark.Vincent Brümmer - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (1):89-97.
An Unfinished Debate: What Are the Aims of Religion and Science?Mikael Stenmark - 1997 - Zygon 32 (4):491-514.
How to Relate Science and Religion a Multidimensional Model.Mikael Stenmark - 2005 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 58 (1):55-58.
Evolution, Purpose and God.Mikael Stenmark - 2001 - Ars Disputandi: The Online Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1.
The Philosophy of Normativity, or How to Try Clearing Things Up a Little.Christine Tappolet & Alan Voizard - 2011 - Dialogue 50 (2):233-238.
Mikael Stenmark Scientism: Science, Ethics and Religion. . Pp. Xi + 152. 40 , 16.99 . ISBN 0 7546 0445 4 ; 0 7546 0446 2. [REVIEW]Fraser Watts - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (2):235-239.
Stenmark, Plantinga, and Scientific Neutrality.Del Ratzsch - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):353-364.
Rationality in Science, Religion and Everyday Life.Mikael Stenmark - 1995 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Stephen Jay Gould and Karl Popper on Sciene and Religion.Amerigo Barzaghi & Josep Corcó - 2016 - Scientia et Fides 4 (2):417-436.
Epistemological Naturalism and the Normativity Objection or From Normativity to Constitutivity.Mikael Janvid - 2004 - Erkenntnis 60 (1):35-49.
Normativity in Comparative Religious Ethics.Kevin Jung - 2017 - Journal of Religious Ethics 45 (4):642-665.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-12-24
Total views
24 ( #476,236 of 2,520,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,555 of 2,520,404 )
2020-12-24
Total views
24 ( #476,236 of 2,520,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,555 of 2,520,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads