Kierkegaard on Indirect Communication, the Crowd, and a Monstrous Illusion

In Robert L. Perkins (ed.), International Kierkegaard Commentary: Point of View. Macon, GA, USA: Mercer University Press. pp. 295-324 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Following the pattern set by the early German Romantics, Kierkegaard conveys many of his insights through literature rather than academic prose. What makes him a valuable member of this tradition is the theory he develops to support it, his so-called “theory of indirect communication.” The most exciting aspect of this theory concerns the alleged importance of indirect communication: Kierkegaard claims that there are some projects only it can accomplish. This paper provides a critical account of two arguments Kierkegaard offers in defense of this claim. The first argument is that he needs to use indirect communication in order to discourage people from losing themselves in the “crowd”. The second argument is that he needs to use it in order to help people out of a “monstrous illusion”. It is shown that while both arguments justify Kierkegaard’s decision to use indirect communication, neither one supports the original claim about its indispensability.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

To Be as No‐One: Kierkegaard and Climacus on the Art of Indirect Communication.Vanessa Rumble - 1995 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 3 (2):307 – 321.
Kierkegaard on indirect communication.Harry S. Broudy - 1961 - Journal of Philosophy 58 (9):225-233.
Stealing a gift: Kierkegaard's pseudonyms and the Bible.Jolita Pons - 2004 - New York: Fordham University Press.
Kierkegaard, indirect communication, and religious truth.J. Kellenberger - 1984 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 16 (2):153 - 160.


Added to PP

1,017 (#13,340)

6 months
196 (#14,590)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Antony Aumann
Northern Michigan University

Citations of this work

A Moral Problem for Difficult Art.Antony Aumann - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (4):383-396.
Kierkegaard on the transformative power of art.Antony Aumann - 2021 - History of European Ideas 47 (3):429-442.
Voices of madness in Foucault and Kierkegaard.Heather C. Ohaneson - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 87 (1):27-54.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Postscript.[author unknown] - 1964 - Vivarium 2 (1):161-162.
Postscript.[author unknown] - 1976 - Philosophy 51 (198):379-379.
Authorship and Authenticity: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein.D. Z. Phillips - 1992 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 17 (1):177-192.
Kierkegaard on indirect communication.Harry S. Broudy - 1961 - Journal of Philosophy 58 (9):225-233.

Add more references