Semiosis, Logic, and Language

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):51-69 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Three fundamental forms of semiotic process (reference, addressing, and intentionality) are presented and their relations to language explained. After that, the fundamental inference forms (formal deduction, induction, and abduction) are presented and their connections with semiosis shown. Finally, we show some important differences between semiosis and inference, and propose to see information processing as a dynamical attractor of inference.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding life.Andres Luure - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):315-325.
Semiosis as an emergent process.Joao Queiroz & Charbel Nino El-Hani - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):78-116.
Spatial semiosis and time.Leonid Tchertov - 2005 - Sign Systems Studies 33 (2):297-314.
Umberto Eco's semiotic threshold.Winfried Nöth - 2000 - Sign Systems Studies 28:49-60.
Subjectivity as an Unlimited Semiosis: Lacan and Peirce.Birgit Nordtug - 2004 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 23 (2/3):87-102.
From materiality to system.Louis Armand - 2006 - Sign Systems Studies 34 (1):105-118.
The circular semiosis of Giorgio Prodi.Felice Cimatti - 2000 - Sign Systems Studies 28:351-378.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
18 (#785,610)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references