Natura czasoprzestrzeni a istnienie zbiorów

Filozofia Nauki 1 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper tries to prove two statements. Firstly, that set-theoretic positions in the controversy on the ontic nature of space-time logically imply set-theoretic realism. Secondly, thatmereological positions in this controversy give set-theoretic nominalism an appearance of verisimilitude

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Order-Theoretic Account of Some Set-Theoretic Paradoxes.Thomas Forster & Thierry Libert - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):1-19.
V = L and intuitive plausibility in set theory. A case study.Tatiana Arrigoni - 2011 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 17 (3):337-360.
The origins of zermelo's axiomatization of set theory.Gregory H. Moore - 1978 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):307 - 329.
The graph-theoretic approach to descriptive set theory.Benjamin D. Miller - 2012 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (4):554-575.
A Model Theoretic Semantics for Quantum Logic.E. -W. Stachow - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:272 - 280.
Is any set theory true?Joseph S. Ullian - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (3):271-279.
Naïve set theory is innocent!A. Weir - 1998 - Mind 107 (428):763-798.
Mass problems and measure-theoretic regularity.Stephen G. Simpson - 2009 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 15 (4):385-409.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-14

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references