Authors’ Response: Communicating Second-Order Science

, &
Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):135-139 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Upshot: For communicating second-order science, von Foerster’s ethical imperative provides a viable starting point. Proceeding from this, we plead in favour of emphasising the common grounds of diverging scientific opinions and of various approaches in second-order science instead of focussing on the differences. This will provide a basis for communication and stimulate scientific self-reflection

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

First Aid for Climate Research with Second-order Science.W. Krauß - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):132-133.
Doing Second-Order R&D.R. Ison - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):130-131.
Ethical issues in communicating science.Professor Jinnie M. Garreu & Stephanie J. Bird - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):435-442.
The Social and Political Context of Science.S. A. Umpleby - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):133-135.
On Detection and Attribution.H. von Storch - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):131-132.
On Climate Change Research, the Crisis of Science and Second-order Science.P. Aufenvenne, H. Egner & K. Elverfeldt - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):120-129.
The golem: Uncertainty and communicating science. [REVIEW]Professor Trevor Pinch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):511-523.
Second-Order Science: A Vast and Largely Unexplored Science Frontier.K. H. Müller & A. Riegler - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):7-15.
Authors’ Response: A Perspectivist View on the Perspectivist View of Interdisciplinary Science.H. F. Alrøe & E. Noe - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):88-95.
Second-Order Science is Enacted Constructivism.M. R. Lissack - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):35-37.
Do We also Need Second-order Mathematics?J. P. Van Bendegem - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):34-35.
Science, Order and Creativity.David Bohm & F. David Peat - 2010 - Routledge.
Hugh Lacey Is Science Value Free?; MWF Stone and Jonathan Wolff (eds.); The Proper Ambition of Science; Eileen Scanlon, Roger Hill and Kirk Junker (eds.); Communicating Science: Professional Contexts; Eileen Scanlon, Elizabeth Whitelegg and Simeon Yates Communicating Science: Contexts and Channels. [REVIEW]F. Moorcroft - 2001 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (3):318-320.
Do We Need a Second-Order Science?M. A. Notturno - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):23-26.
The golem: Uncertainty and communicating science.Trevor Pinch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):511-523.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-15

Downloads
40 (#387,619)

6 months
1 (#1,533,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references