Gödel’s Dialectica Interpretation and Leibniz

In Robert Tragesser, Mark van Atten & Mark Atten (eds.), Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer. Cham: Springer Verlag (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cartesian closed Dialectica categories.Bodil Biering - 2008 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 156 (2):290-307.
Godel's interpretation of intuitionism.William Tait - 2006 - Philosophia Mathematica 14 (2):208-228.
Monads and Sets: On Gödel, Leibniz, and the Reflection Principle.Mark van Atten & Mark Atten - 2015 - In Robert Tragesser, Mark van Atten & Mark Atten (eds.), Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 3-33.
Dialectica interpretation of well-founded induction.Helmut Schwichtenberg - 2008 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (3):229-239.
Shoenfield is Gödel after Krivine.Thomas Streicher & Ulrich Kohlenbach - 2007 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 53 (2):176-179.
Predicative functionals and an interpretation of ⌢ID.Jeremy Avigad - 1998 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 92 (1):1-34.
Unifying Functional Interpretations.Paulo Oliva - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (2):263-290.
Gödel and Intuitionism.Mark van Atten & Mark Atten - 2015 - In Robert Tragesser, Mark van Atten & Mark Atten (eds.), Essays on Gödel’s Reception of Leibniz, Husserl, and Brouwer. Cham: Springer Verlag.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark van Atten
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references