Complementarity in Classical Dynamical Systems

Foundations of Physics 36 (2):291-306 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of complementarity, originally defined for non-commuting observables of quantum systems with states of non-vanishing dispersion, is extended to classical dynamical systems with a partitioned phase space. Interpreting partitions in terms of ensembles of epistemic states (symbols) with corresponding classical observables, it is shown that such observables are complementary to each other with respect to particular partitions unless those partitions are generating. This explains why symbolic descriptions based on an ad hoc partition of an underlying phase space description should generally be expected to be incompatible. Related approaches with different background and different objectives are discussed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lewis, causality, and possible worlds.Graham White - 2000 - Dialectica 54 (2):133–137.
Determinism is ontic, determinability is epistemic.Harald Atmanspacher - 2001 - In Harald Atmanspacher & Robert C. Bishop (eds.), Between Chance and Choice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Determinism. Thorverton Uk: Imprint Academic. pp. 49--74.
Contextual emergence from physics to cognitive neuroscience.Harald Atmanspacher - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (1-2):18-36.
Today's dynamical systems are too simple.Herbert Jaeger - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):643-644.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
60 (#261,850)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?