The Legal Logic of the Master-Signifier in Pseudo-Freedom of Expression: A Self-Guarantee for the Reformist Modes of Self-Expression in Islamic Republic of Iran

Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 12 (1):25-51 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Appearing in the “Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam” as an undefined referent for the limits on freedom of expression in Islam, Shariah is still to be chased as an indefinable referent which restricts freedom of the expression in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran’s Press Law as well as Constitution unveil Shariah’s referent to be a person: the Jurist-Ruler around whom a cult of personality is legalized in terms of “Imamate” and around whom all the limits on freedom of expression revolve. Interpretation of Shariah is not a solution but part of the problem in Iran. Such problem can be dealt in terms of three modes of self-expression which were invented by the Iranian Reformists to avoid self-censorship. The notion of master-signifier can be the key to unraveling the problem of self-referentiality in freedom of expression and its Reformist solution in Iran’s legal system.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Iranian Law and Women's Rights.Mehrangiz Kar - 2007 - Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 4 (1).
Charlie Hebdo: Testing the Limits of Freedom of Expression.Niaz A. Shah - 2017 - Muslim World Journal of Human Rights 14 (1).
Is There a Right of Freedom of Expression?[author unknown] - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (1):97-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
19 (#824,557)

6 months
8 (#416,172)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?