There’s No Place Like ‘Here’ and No Time Like ‘Now’

American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3):271-80 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is it possible for me to refer to someone other than myself with the word "I"? Or somewhere other than where I am with the word "here"? Or some time other than the present with the word "now"? David Kaplan, who provides the best worked out semantics for pure-indexical terms like "I," "here," and "now" suggests, quite intuitively, that I could not. Put simply, "I am here now" looks as though I can never utter it and have it turn out false. But, intuitive as this seems, one need only hear the answering machine message, "Sorry! I am not here now," to see that there may be problems. If! can't fail to refer to where I am and when I'm there with "here" and "now," why is my apparently contradictory assertion so readily comprehensible? Many have been quick to abandon Kaplan's account of pure-indexicals in the face of such problems. The focus of this paper, though, is those who develop sophisticated accounts of how we determine different contexts for applying pure-indexicals. The hope is that this handles problem cases while allowing us to retain most of Kaplan's theory. However, this paper introduces and examines some additional uses of pure-indexicals which pose an interesting problem for the context-determination adaptation of Kaplan's account. It is argued that context-determination theorists cannot explain these cases in the same way that they explain standard problem cases, and that any reason they can offer for denying the relevance of such cases to accounts of pure-indexicals will apply equally well to the cases that motivate their theories, thus rendering context-determination accounts superfluous. In what follows, then, there is a brief summary of Kaplan's account, the problem cases that threaten it, and the context-determination theorist's response to these problem cases. The interesting and problematic uses of pure-indexicals that context-determination accounts cannot explain are then introduced, and an explanation is given of why there is no way for the context-determination theorist to exclude these cases from our accounts of pure-indexicals without also excluding the cases that motivate their own theory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The impurity of “pure” indexicals.Allyson Mount - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (2):193 - 209.
Quasi Indexicals.Justin Khoo - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (1):26-53.
I.K. Romdenh-Romluc - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 128 (2):257-283.
Indexicals in Virtual Environments.Bernardo Alonso - 2014 - Open Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):134-140.
Utterance at a distance.Graham Stevens - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (2):213 - 221.

Analytics

Added to PP
n/a

Downloads
727 (#30,083)

6 months
70 (#82,473)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Albert Atkin
Macquarie University

Citations of this work

I Am Still Not Here Now.Stefano Predelli - 2011 - Erkenntnis 74 (3):289-303.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
I am not here now.Stefano Predelli - 1998 - Analysis 58 (2):107–115.
I am not here now.S. Predelli - 1998 - Analysis 58 (2):107-115.
Who Is I?Eros Corazza, William Fish & Jonathan Gorvett - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 107 (1):1-21.
The Answering Machine Paradox.Alan Sidelle - 1991 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):525--539.

View all 10 references / Add more references