Reasoning dynamically about what one says

Synthese 183 (S1):5-31 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


’s glue logic for computing logical form dynamic. This allows us to model a dialogue agent’s understanding of what the update of the semantic representation of the dialogue would be after his next contribution, including the effects of the rhetorical moves that he is contemplating performing next. This is a pre-requisite for developing a model of how agents reason about what to say next. We make the glue logic dynamic by using a dynamic public announcement logic ( pal ). We extend pal with a particular variety of default reasoning suited to reasoning about discourse—this default reasoning being an essential component of inferring the pragmatic effects of one’s dialogue moves. We add to the pal language a new type of announcement, known as ceteris paribus announcement, and this is used to model how an agent anticipates the (default) pragmatic effects of his next dialogue move. Our extended pal validates certain intuitive patterns of default inference that existing pal s for practical reasoning do not. We prove that the dynamic glue logic has a pspace validity problem, and as such is no more complex than pal with multiple $${\square}$$ operators



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,412

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Uniform Logic of Information Dynamics.Wesley H. Holliday, Tomohiro Hoshi & Thomas F. Icard - 2012 - In Thomas Bolander, Torben Braüner, Silvio Ghilardi & Lawrence Moss (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic 9. College Publications. pp. 348-367.
Temporal languages for epistemic programs.Joshua Sack - 2008 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (2):183-216.
An interpretation of default logic in minimal temporal epistemic logic.Joeri Engelfriet & Jan Treur - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (3):369-388.
A base logic for default reasoning.Beihai Zhou & Yi Mao - 2006 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (4):688-709.
Reasoning about action and change.Helmut Prendinger & Gerhard Schurz - 1996 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5 (2):209-245.


Added to PP

99 (#150,187)

6 months
2 (#523,542)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Asher
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

On denying presuppositions.Lenny Clapp - 2017 - Synthese 194 (6).
Inferences and illocutions.David Botting - 2016 - Argument and Computation 6 (3):246-264.

Add more citations