Some comments on the begriffsschrift and natural language

Philosophical Papers 12 (2):32-38 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If the begriffsschrift from Frege does represent the logical form of natural language it either lacks a logical form itself, or its logical form is different to that of natural language. But Frege insists that his notation has a logical form. So the second disjunct holds. This suggests that Frege's notation will generate consequences different to those that can be derived with natural language, with its different logical form. For anyone looking for "a means of avoiding misunderstandings", as Frege does, this would be unpalatable, to say the least.

Similar books and articles

Linguistics and natural logic.George Lakoff - 1970 - Synthese 22 (1-2):151 - 271.
Knowledge and experience.Calvin Dwight Rollins (ed.) - 1962 - [Pittsburgh, Pa.]: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Natural rights and political legitimacy.Christopher W. Morris - 2005 - Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (1):314-329.
Understanding natural language.John Haugeland - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (November):619-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
281 (#69,367)

6 months
91 (#45,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alan Schwerin
Rice University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Conceptual Notation and Related Articles. [REVIEW]John Corcoran & David Levin - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 36 (1):454-455.

Add more references