Disciplinary Power and Testimonial Narrative in Schindler's List

Film and Philosophy 8:51-62 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Steven Spielberg‘s filmed representation of the Holocaust dares its viewers to experience, as secondary witnesses, atrocities committed by the Nazis in Poland. The film is yet another form of testimonial narrative (audio-visual but lacking a full historical context, except for a few on-screen titles) which aligns the survivors, who have come to be known as the Schindler Jews, and their descendants, on the one hand, and Spielberg‘s cameraman (comparable to an internalized narrator), Spielberg the film director (an external, omniscient narrator), and the film-theater audience, on the other. We are all turned into witnesses in the same process and at the same time in which the real witnesses, the survivors, testify to the horror of the Holocaust.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biopower and the Liberationist Romance.Bruce Jennings - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (4):16-20.
On Stories.Richard Kearney - 2001 - Routledge.
On the role of the oneiric in testimonial narrative.Eileen Rizo-Patron - 2007 - In Peter Gratton, John Panteleimon Manoussakis & Richard Kearney (eds.), Traversing the Imaginary: Richard Kearney and the Postmodern Challenge. Northwestern University Press.
Testimony, testimonial belief, and safety.Charlie Pelling - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (1):205-217.
Knowing at second hand.Benjamin McMyler - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (5):511 – 540.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-19

Downloads
499 (#35,956)

6 months
151 (#20,113)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eugene L. Arva
University of Miami

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references