The topology of justification

Logic and Logical Philosophy 17 (1-2):59-71 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Justification Logic is a family of epistemic logical systems obtained from modal logics of knowledge by adding a new type of formula t:F, which is read t is a justification for F. The principal epistemic modal logic S4 includes Tarski’s well-known topological interpretation, according to which the modality 2X is read the Interior of X in a topological space (the topological equivalent of the ‘knowable part of X’). In this paper, we extend Tarski’s topological interpretation from S4 to Justification Logic systems with both modality and justification assertions. The topological semantics interprets t:X as a reachable subset of X (the topological equivalent of ‘test t confirms X’). We establish a number of soundness and completeness results with respect to Kripke topology and the real topology for S4-based systems of Justification Logic

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
28 (#553,203)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sergei Artemov
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Explicit provability and constructive semantics.Sergei N. Artemov - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):1-36.
The Algebra of Topology.J. C. C. Mckinsey & Alfred Tarski - 1944 - Annals of Mathematics, Second Series 45:141-191.
The logic of proofs, semantically.Melvin Fitting - 2005 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 132 (1):1-25.
Topological reasoning and the logic of knowledge.Andrew Dabrowski, Lawrence S. Moss & Rohit Parikh - 1996 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 78 (1-3):73-110.
Logic of proofs.Sergei Artëmov - 1994 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 67 (1-3):29-59.

View all 13 references / Add more references