On the Non-Idealist Leibniz

The Leibniz Review 28:97-101 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a reply to Samuel Levey's fine review of my Monads, Composition and Force (Oxford UP, 2018) in the same issue of the Leibniz Review. In it I take up various difficulties raised by Levey that may be thought to collapse Leibniz's position into idealism after all, and attempt to provide convincing responses to them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What kind of idealist was Leibniz?Michael K. Shim - 2005 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (1):91 – 110.
Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. [REVIEW]Stephen Grover - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (2):303-304.
Leibniz. [REVIEW] Sleigh - 1994 - The Leibniz Review 4:1-2.
Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1994 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Leibniz. [REVIEW]John Carriero, Massimo Mugnai & Daniel Garber - 1996 - The Leibniz Review 6:61-106.
Leibniz and the Fardella Memo.Shane Duarte - 2009 - Studia Leibnitiana 41 (1):67-87.
Was Leibniz an idealist?Peter Loptson - 1999 - Philosophy 74 (3):361-385.
Rethinking Leibniz.G. H. R. Parkinson - 1996 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (2):399 – 407.
Leibniz.Douglas Bertrand Marshall - 2011 - The Leibniz Review 21:9-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-15

Downloads
44 (#352,984)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard T. W. Arthur
McMaster University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references