Between assured destruction and nuclear victory: The case for the "mad-plus" posture

Ethics 95 (3):497-516 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/292656

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Forum on Mutually Assured Destruction.Duncan Richter, Dylan Suzanne & Robert Martin - 2002 - Philosophy Now 37:7-9.
An Examination of a Moral Argument against Nuclear Deterrence.Robert McKim - 1985 - Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (2):279 - 297.
Nuclear weapons and the ultimate environmental crisis.Michael Allen Fox - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (2):159-179.
Between MAD and Counterforce.James P. Sterba - 1986 - Social Theory and Practice 12 (2):173-199.
Mad, bad, or disagreeing? On moral competence and responsibility.Maureen Sie - 2000 - Philosophical Explorations 3 (3):262 – 281.
Disarming nuclear apologists.Robert E. Goodin - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):153 – 176.
Nuclear Deterrence and Moral Restraint: Critical Choices for American Strategy.Henry Shue (ed.) - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
62 (#254,871)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On Defense by Nuclear Deterrence.Jan Narveson - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 12:195-211.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references