Value and unacceptable risk

Economics and Philosophy 21 (2):177-197 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Consider a transitive value ordering of outcomes and lotteries on outcomes, which satisfies substitutivity of equivalents and obeys “continuity for easy cases,” i.e., allows compensating risks of small losses by chances of small improvements. Temkin (2001) has argued that such an ordering must also – rather counter-intuitively – allow chances of small improvements to compensate risks of huge losses. In this paper, we show that Temkin's argument is flawed but that a better proof is possible. However, it is more difficult to determine what conclusions should be drawn from this result. Contrary to what Temkin suggests, substitutivity of equivalents is a notoriously controversial principle. But even in the absence of substitutivity, the counter-intuitive conclusion is derivable from a strengthened version of continuity for easy cases. The best move, therefore, might be to question the latter principle, even in its original simple version: as we argue, continuity for easy cases gives rise to a sorites.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,102

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Transitivity and vagueness.Mozaffar Qizilbash - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):109-131.
Inequality.Larry S. Temkin - 1986 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (2):99-121.
Counterexamples to the transitivity of better than.Stuart Rachels - 1998 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (1):71 – 83.
Intransitivity and the person-affecting principle.Alastair Norcross - 1999 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):769-776.
A "new" principle of aggregation.Larry S. Temkin - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):218–234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
215 (#87,721)

6 months
42 (#84,930)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Gustaf Arrhenius
Stockholm University
Wlodek Rabinowicz
Lund University

Citations of this work

Intrinsic vs. extrinsic value.Michael J. Zimmerman - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Value relations revisited.Wlodek Rabinowicz - 2012 - Economics and Philosophy 28 (2):133-164.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references