- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
139-43, 148, 186; co-author of Chapter 6; see also Grafton, ST et al.; Jeannerod, M. et al. Armstrong, DF: et al. 128 Armstrong, SL: et al 10-11, 21, 41-2 [Book Review]
M. Aronoff, R. W. Ashby, H. Atmanspacher, S. Avrutin, B. Baars, J. Balling, J. Balogh, A. Bandura, R. G. Barker & J. Barkow
In Philip R. Loockvane (ed.), The Nature of Concepts: Evolution, Structure, and Representation. Routledge (1999)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
"Mirror images" are physical objects: A reply to mr. Armstrong.M. Arthadeva - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):160 – 162.
Armstrong's Conception of Supervenience.Markku Keinänen - 2008 - In Tim de Mey & Markku Keinänen (eds.), Problems From Armstrong. Acta Philosophica Fennica 84. pp. 51.
Does 'ought' conversationally implicate 'can'?Bart Streumer - 2003 - European Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):219–228.
Armstrong and van Fraassen on Probabilistic Laws of Nature.Duncan Maclean - 2012 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):1-13.
Armstrong and the modal inversion of dispositions.Toby Handfield - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):452–461.
Does Armstrong need states of affairs?James D. Rissler - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):193 – 209.
Engineering understanding.Sören Törnkvist, Jean Armstrong & Helen Armstrong - 1998 - Metascience 7 (3):432-442.
Armstrong on determinable and substantival universals.Martin Tweedale - 1984 - In Radu J. Bogdan (ed.), D. M. Armstrong. D. Reidel. pp. 171-89.
Place and Armstrong's Views Compared.D. M. Armstrong - 1996 - In Tim Crane (ed.), Dispositions: A Debate. New York: Routledge. pp. 33--48.
Dispositions pace Armstrong.Robrecht Vanderbeeken - 2008 - In T. Im de Mey & Markku Keinänen (eds.), Problems From Armstrong. Acta Philosophica Fennica 84. pp. 127--153.
Professor Armstrong on 'non-physical sensory items'.Howard M. Robinson - 1972 - Mind 81 (January):84-86.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-02-01
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2014-02-01
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-sqt28 uwo