Neutrality and Utility

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):215 - 240 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to the ideal of tolerance, the state is supposed to be neutral or evenhanded in its dealings with religious sects and doctrines. The tolerant state does not pursue policies aimed at favoring one sect over another.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
77 (#211,913)

6 months
18 (#135,981)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard J. Arneson
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

Neutrality, Publicity, and State Funding of the Arts.Harry Brighouse - 1995 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (1):35-63.
Bearing the consequences of belief.Peter Jones - 1994 - Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (1):24–43.
Public reason and democracy.Andrew Lister - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (3):273-289.
Property Rights in Persons.Richard J. Arneson - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (1):201-230.
Liberal legitimacy, reasonable disagreement and justice.Simon Caney - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (3):19-36.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Philosophy 63 (243):119-122.
Moral conflict and political legitimacy.Thomas Nagel - 1987 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (3):215-240.
The priority of right and ideas of the good.John Rawls - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (4):251-276.
Why dialogue?Bruce Ackerman - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (1):5-22.

View all 11 references / Add more references