Midwest Studies in Philosophy 20 (1):142-164 (1995)

Authors
Arnold Zuboff
University College London
Abstract
If I desire to drink some stuff thinking it is hot chocolate when actually it is hot mud, my desire is not a real one - it’s mistaken or only apparent. This example illustrates how a desire must always depend on a belief about its object, a belief about what it is and what it’s like. But beliefs are correctable, so desires are correctable. This leads us directly to a very sweeping principle - that I only really desire what I would be desiring with a perfect grasp of everything involved. If there’s something that I desire only because my grasp of it is less than perfect, then it is not something that I really desire. I have no real reason for wanting it, and it would not be in my real self-interest to get it. The hypothetical perfect grasp that defines a real desire would have to have a God-like reach into all the relevant realities in all their actuality and all their potential. And it would have to include perfectly within it all the desires of all those affected by what the grasp was of. Therefore what would be wanted in a perfect grasp would be a reconciliation of all the systems of desire contained within it - not as they happen to be but as they would be corrected by a perfect grasp. This reconciliation of systems of desire is that which morality requires. Therefore what I really want - my own fully-corrected self-interest - is precisely the same as the requirements of morality. This sameness explains and justifies morality’s categorical character and over-riding authority.
Keywords morality  ethics  value
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1995.tb00309.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Equality.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Morality and Hot Mud.Arnold Zuboff - 2002 - Philosophy Now 37:39-40.
The Desires of Others.Berislav Marušić - 2010 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):385-400.
Ambivalent Desires and the Problem with Reduction.Derek Clayton Baker - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 150 (1):37-47.
Second-Order Desire Accounts of Autonomy.Dennis Loughrey - 1998 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 6 (2):211 – 229.
Needs Versus Desires.E. Larson - 1994 - Dialogue (Misc) 37 (1):1-10.
Why Should I Care About Morality?Arnold Zuboff - 2001 - Philosophy Now 31:24-27.
Unselfishness.Christopher G. Framarin - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (1):69-83.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total views
691 ( #9,896 of 2,462,070 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
51 ( #16,925 of 2,462,070 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes