Causal paradoxes in special relativity

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (2):223-243 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It has been argued that the existence of faster than light particles in the context of special relativity would imply the possibility to influence the past, and that this would lead to paradox. In this paper I argue that such conclusions cannot safely be drawn without consideration of the equations of motion of such particles. I show that such equations must be non-local, that they can be deterministic, and that they can avoid the suggested paradoxes. I also discuss conservation of energymomentum, and how instantaneous action at a distance can avoid similar paradoxes. *I am most grateful for helpful comments made by John Earman, and especially John Norton, who is responsible for anything that makes sense in this paper. I am also grateful for the reception of a Mellon postdoctoral fellowship, which supported me whilst doing the research for this paper

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tachyon Signals, Causal Paradoxes, and the Relativity of Simultaneity.Steven F. Savitt - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:277 - 292.
On causal loops in the quantum realm.Joseph Berkovitz - 2002 - In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-Locality and Modality. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 235--257.
Some relativistic and higher order supertasks.Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (3):502-517.
Predicting the motion of particles in Newtonian mechanics and special relativity.C. G., G. R. & H. J. - 1998 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29 (1):81-122.
Another look at general covariance and the equivalence of reference frames.Dennis Dieks - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (1):174-191.
Are probabilism and special relativity compatible?Nicholas Maxwell - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):640-645.
Jarrett's Locality Condition and Causal Paradox.Allen Stairs - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:318 - 325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
124 (#140,789)

6 months
21 (#115,623)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank Arntzenius
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Is there an independent principle of causality in physics.John D. Norton - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):475-486.
Schwinger and the ontology of quantum field theory.Edward MacKinnon - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (4):295-323.
Relativistic hidden variable theories?Frank Arntzenius - 1994 - Erkenntnis 41 (2):207 - 231.
Would Superluminal Influences Violate the Principle of Relativity?Kent Peacock - 2014 - Lato Sensu: Revue de la Société de Philosophie des Sciences 1 (1):49-62.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references