Buddhist idealism, epistemic and otherwise: Thoughts on the alternating perspectives of dharmakīrti

Sophia 47 (1):3-28 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Some influential interpreters of Dharmakīrti have suggested understanding his thought in terms of a ‘sliding scale of analysis.’ Here it is argued that this emphasis on Dharmakīrti's alternating philosophical perspectives, though helpful in important respects, obscures the close connection between the two views in play. Indeed, with respect to these perspectives as Dharmakīrti develops them, the epistemology is the same either way. Insofar as that is right, John Dunne's characterization of Dharmakīrti's Yogācāra as ‘epistemic idealism ’ may not, after all, distinguish this perspective from Sautrāntika; indeed, epistemic idealism can be understood as just the view these positions share. Thus, what distinguishes the ‘Yogācāra’ section of Dharmakīrti's texts is simply his making explicit that epistemological commitments the Sautrāntika does hold are already compatible with idealism. Sautrāntika and Yogācāra thus differ only when one turns to the metaphysical arguments that additionally show that only such mental things as sense data could be real



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,649

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

89 (#136,560)

6 months
3 (#211,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dan Arnold
University of Chicago

References found in this work

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Mind and World.John Mcdowell - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):99-109.
The Content of Perceptual Experience.John McDowell - 1994 - Philosopical Quarterly 44 (175):190-205.
Knowledge and the Internal.John Mcdowell - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (4):877-93.

View all 23 references / Add more references