Universals: an opinionated introduction

Boulder: Westview Press (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this short text, a distinguished philosopher turns his attention to one of the oldest and most fundamental philosophical problems of all: How it is that we are able to sort and classify different things as being of the same natural class? Professor Armstrong carefully sets out six major theories—ancient, modern, and contemporary—and assesses the strengths and weaknesses of each. Recognizing that there are no final victories or defeats in metaphysics, Armstrong nonetheless defends a traditional account of universals as the most satisfactory theory we have.This study is written for advanced students, but as Armstrong goes considerably beyond his earlier work on this topic, it will interest professional scholars as well. Carefully plotted and clearly written, Universals is both a paradigm of exposition and a case study on the value of careful analysis of fundamental issues in philosophy

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,859

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Selection from Universals: An Opinionated Introduction.D. M. Armstrong - 2004 - In Tim Crane & Katalin Farkas, Metaphysics: a guide and anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Exemplification as molecular function.Javier Cumpa - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (2):335-342.
Armstrong on Quantities and Resemblance.Maya Eddon - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 136 (3):385-404.
Natural classes of universals: Why Armstrong's analysis fails.Lowell Friesen - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):285 – 296.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
808 (#33,272)

6 months
50 (#106,807)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

By Our Bootstraps.Karen Bennett - 2011 - Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):27-41.
What good are our intuitions: Philosophical analysis and social kinds.Sally Haslanger - 2006 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 80 (1):89-118.
Inference to the Best explanation.Peter Lipton - 2005 - In Martin Curd & Stathis Psillos, The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge. pp. 193.
Graded Qualities.Claudio Calosi & Robert Michels - 2025 - Synthese 205 (116).

View all 430 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references